<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can&#8217;t sell your car? Apparently just throw some typography at it. Wait… what? Really?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.estudiointerlinea.com/archives/3125/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.estudiointerlinea.com/archives/3125</link>
	<description>observations, thoughts and ideas by Armando Rigau / Alberto Rigau</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:09:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: marty</title>
		<link>http://blog.estudiointerlinea.com/archives/3125#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.estudiointerlinea.com/?p=3125#comment-186</guid>
		<description>the typography IS the content. haha. just giving you a hard time. great insight and comparisons about the use of kinetic type. it&#039;s interesting that you refer to kinetic type as a technique. do you not see it as another genre? in my opinion the ad, The Car That Reads the Road, actually has a pretty integrated conversation going on between the imagery and typography, whereas the first ad is just BAD. overwhelming in every sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the typography IS the content. haha. just giving you a hard time. great insight and comparisons about the use of kinetic type. it&#8217;s interesting that you refer to kinetic type as a technique. do you not see it as another genre? in my opinion the ad, The Car That Reads the Road, actually has a pretty integrated conversation going on between the imagery and typography, whereas the first ad is just BAD. overwhelming in every sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

